Home

Tuesday, September 29, 1998

PAL Ticket Holders Nowhere to Turn to

The Negros Chronicle
Tuesday, September 29, 1998

The holders of Philippine Airlines ticket has nowhere to refund due to the closure of PAL's ticketing office in the domestic airport here.

Everyday, since PAL closed last week, the ticket holders tried refund their tickets but to no avail due to the closure of its office in this city.

Many of those who tried to claim refund were those whose tickets were returned to three days before its closure.

The ticket holders were given each a paper as a proof that they priority when PAL sends money to refund the tickets.

However, as of yesterday, none of the claimants had been refunded. Those who went to PAL office only Sunday had nowhere to go to get even a bit of information on how to refund their tickets.

Last Thursday, PAL ticket file clerk Rolando Austero, PALEA shop steward for Legazpi office, said the office could not refund the tickets due to absence of cash. Austero said refund could only be done if there are ticket sales.

But due to the closure of PAL, Austero said all the cash were all ready deposited in the bank and the only way for ticket holders to refund is to go to PAL's Refund Center in Greenbelt, Makati.

He said all the ticket holders who tried to get refund were all ready advised to go to the Refund Center.

'Asia's Sunniest' to Shine Anew?

The Negros Chronicle
Tuesday, September 29, 1998

The Philippine Airlines is expected to again fly the friendly skies on Wednesday, after its management and labor union finally came to an agreement to save the company.

This was announced by President Estrada in a press briefing called at the Main Conference Room of MalacaƱang as he welcomed the decision of the PAL Employees' Association (PALEA) to accept the offer of PAL Chairman Lucio Tan of 60,000 shares of stock for each worker. In exchange for a 10-year suspension in the collective bargaining agreement.

PALEA submitted to President Estrada a letter appealing for the reopening of PAL “in the interest, not only of the thousand employees of PAL who are presently out of jobs, but for the greater interest of the Filipino nation.

"To assure investors and creditors of industrial peace, PALEA agrees, subject to the ratification by the general membership the suspension of the PAL-PALEA CBA for a period of 10 years, provided safeguards are in place,” the letter stated.

The ratification is set to be called on Wednesday during general meeting with the members of the union, where a document is expected to be passed around for their signature signifying their approval of the move to accept the Tan offer.

The letter asking for the President's intercession in the PAL problem was signed by PALEA President Alexander Barrientos, PALEA Vice-President Garardo Rivera and board members Pablito Arcilla, Marlon Balanquit, Jaime Bautista, Paulino Hernandez, Jose Arcadio Relova, Dennis Aranas, Romeo Sauler and Noel Tria.

Back-tracking on their earlier decision not to accept the Tan offer, PALEA officers said, "We are amenable to the following, subject ratification of the general noted membership," which include the decisions by PAL management to remove 3,000 of the 8,000 employees through voluntary retirement.

This was how Executive Secretary Ronald Zamora interpreted the condition cited by PALEA who noted that the airline “shall grant the benefits under the 26 July 1998 Memorandum of agreement forged by and between PAL and PALEA to those employees who may opt to retire or be separated from the company,’’

Zamora, in the same press briefing, said PAL may resume with a reduced workforce of just 5,000, or it can retain its present size of 8,000 depending on the decision of the management.

President Estrada said the agreement between PAL and PALEA will be maintained, even if foreign investors come in to infuse more capital in the airline to sustain its operations and the airline to sustain its operation and prevent its collapse.

Among the two airlines which are expected to come as new investors in PAL are Cathay Pacific and Northwest Airline, President Estrada said. The Chief Executive visions limiting the ownership of the individual to just 40 percent of the Philippine companies will have to be maintained with the entry of PAL investors.

Saturday, September 26, 1998

2 Dayuhang Kompanya, Interesado sa PAL

Kabayan
Saturday, September 26, 1998

Kunumpirma ni Pangulong Estrada na may dalawang dayuhang kompanya ang interesadong sagipin ang Philippine Airlines Inc. (PAL).

Ayon kay Estrada, mayroong dalawang dayuhang airline company na nakahandang pumasok sa PAL upang maiwasan ang tuluyang paghinto ng operasyon nito. Gayunman, tumanggi si Estrada na banggitin ang pangalan ng dalawang kompanya.

"Hindi ko masabi, pero meron nang dalawang kompanyang malalaki ang interesado sa PAL," ani Estrada.

Kaugnay rito, bumuo ng isang Management Committee and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) na siyang naatasang mangasiwa sa mga assets ng PAL at magsuri na rin sa mga natitirang posibilidad upang ito ay muling bigyan ng buhay at muling makapaglingkod sa mga mamamayan.

Sa isang ipinalabas na order ng SEC, sinabi nito na bumuo na sila ng isang comittee (ito ay naayon na rin sa petisyon ng PAL) para pag-aralan kung ano pa ang maaaring gawin para maiwasan ang pagka-ubos ng 'assets' ng naturang kompanya.

Sa naging kautusan ni Fe Eloisa Gloria, Chairman ng hearing panel, at sina Josefina Pasay-Paz at Ysobel Yasay-Murillo (mga miyembro ng hearing panel) na bubuo sila ng may anirn na katao para siyang magmando sa nasabing operasyon.

Ang anim na katao ay magmumula sa PAL management, labor sector, secured creditors, unsecured creditors, government financial institutions (GPIs) at SEC. Aalamin sa Isang eleksyon sa mga nasabing opisyal sa kung sino ang kanilang hihiranging Chairman ng Management Committee.

Sa ilalim din ng nasabing kautusan, ang magiging kapangyarihan ng nasabing kumite ay ang sumusunod:

- mangasiwa at mangalaga sa lahat ng 'existing asset' at pag-aari ng PAL;
- mag-evaluate ng mga existing assets at liabilities;
- maghanap at magdetermina ng mga paraan upang protektahan ang interes ng
mga investors at creditors; at
- patuloy na pag-aralan at suriin ang mga feasibility studies na puwedeng
gamitin sa PAL para matuloy ang naputol na operasyon nito.

Ayon sa SEC, ang naturang komite ay hindi mananagot sa anumang mga hakbangin at desisyon na kanilang gagawin kaugnay ng usapin sa PAL.

"The management committee shall not be subject to any action, claim or demand for, in connection with, any act done or omitted to be done by it in good fate in the exercise of its function," sabi ng SEC.

Mga Piloto ng PAL, Idinemanda ni Tan

Kabayan
Saturday, September 26, 1998

Nagsampa ng P100-milyong libel suit noong Huwebes si Philippine Airlines (PAL) Chairman Lucio Tan laban sa Airline Pilots Association of the Philippines (ALPAP), spokesman nito, English broadsheet Philippine Daily Inquirer (PDI) at ang reporter nito dahil sa paninirang-puri sa kanyang pangalan at reputasyon bilang isang kilalang negosyante.

Ang reklamo ay batay sa istoryang pinamagatang "Tan's firms made P25 billion as PAL bled," at editorial cartoon na nagpapakita na diumano'y sinadya ni Tan ang pagkalugi at pagsasara ng national flag carrier habang kumikita naman siya sa kanyang negosyo sa PAL.

Kabilang sa sinampahan ng kaso ay si Florencio Umali, spokesperson ng ALPAP, at Armand Nocum, reporter ng PDI.

Ang istorya ni Nocum ay batay sa mga pahayag ni Umali sa isang press conference ng ALPAP. Sa istoryang ito ni Nocum, nakasaad dito ang maraming alegasyon at paninirang-puri ng ALPAP spokesperson laban kay Tan.

Kasama rito ang sinasabing "kinita ni Tan mula sa PAL related deals na mabawi diumano nito ang kanyang pagkalugi ng P10.36 bilyon mula sa kanyang 70 percent equity sa PAL" sa kabila nang napaulat na pagkalugi nito

Ayon pa kay Umali, kumita diumano si Tan ng P3.93 bilyon bilang komisyon mula sa 12 aircraft leasing firms sa Japan at Hongkong.

Sa reklamong isinampa ng abogado ni Tan, sinabi ng PAL Chairman na ang nasabing balita ay "paninirang puri lamang sa kanyang pangalan at reputasyon na kanyang iningatan sa loob ng mahabang panahon sa larangan ng negosyo sa Pilipinas."

Ayon sa abogado ni Tan, may malisya ang pagkakasulat at pagkakalathala ng istoryang na ito dahil "alam ng nasasakdal na ang bintang na ito ay walang katotohanan na siyang naging dahilan ng biglaang paglalathala nang hindi inaalam kung may katotohanan nga o wala ang bintang na ito."

Labis na dinamdam ni Tan ang bintang at paninirang puri sa kanyang reputasyon, naging dahilan ng kanyang paghihinagpis at labis na pag-iisip, nararapat lamang na magbayad nang hindi bababa sa P100 milyon ang ibayad ng mga nasasakdal sa perwisyong idinulot nito sa kanya.

Nakiusap din si Tan sa korte na kailangang magbayad din nang exemplary damages ng hindi bababa sa P18 milyon dahil sa pagiging pabigla-bigla at pagwawalang-bahala sa kanyang karapatan at P2 milyon bilang attorney's fee at litigation expenses.

Samantala, sinabi ng Credit Agricole Indosuez (dating Banque Indosuez) na walang katotohanan ang mga naunang alegasyon ng ALPAP na nagtayo si Tan ng 12 dummy firms sa Japan, France at Hongkong upang makaligtas sa pagbabayad ng buwis.

Ang Credit Agricole Indosuez ay siyang head ng Asian Aerospace Group na sinasabi ng Alpap na isang dummy o front para sa mga financing activities ni Lucio Tan.

"Credit Agricole owns all those companies to hold title to the aircraft which is the security of the various lenders. They are not dummy firms, they are registered and functioning business entities engaged in aircraft lease transactions. Mr. Tan has absolutely no shareholding and receivables and no dividends from these companies," sabi ni Frederic Mireur ng Credit Agricole.

P100-M Libel vs ALPAP

Taliba
Saturday, September 26,1998

NAGSAMPA kahapon si Philippine Airlines (PAL) Chairman Lucio Tan ng P100 milyong libel suit laban sa Airline Pilots Association of the Philippines (ALPAP), sa spokesman nito, sa Philippine Daily Inquirer at sa isang reporter dahil sa umano’y paninira sa kanyang pangalan at reputasyon bilang isang prominenteng negosyante.

Ang reklamo bunga ng paglalathala sa nabanggit na pahayagan ng isang balita kung saan sinasabing kumita ang mga kumpanya ni Tan ng P25 milyon habang nalulugi ang PAL. Mayroon ding lumabas na editorial cartoon ng araw na iyon kung saan ipinapakitang sinasadya umano ni Tan ang pagbasak at pagsasara ng flag carrier habang kumikita naman sa mga negosyong kunektado pa rin sa PAL.

Ang pinanggalingan ng balita ay isang panayam kay ALPAP spokesperson Florencio Umali na kasama rin sa mga nakademanda.

Sa nasabing panayam, inakusahan ni Umali si Tan ng pagkita ng P3.93 bilyong komisyon mula sa 12 aircraft leasing firms nito sa Japan at Hongkong.

Sa reklamong isinampa ng abogado ni Tan, sinabi ng PAL Chairman na ang mga akusasyon ni Umali ay lubha umanong nakasisira ng kanyang reputasyon.

Lucio Tan, 6 Opisyal ng Palasyo, Ipatatawag sa Senado


Taliba
Saturday, September 26, 1998

IPATATAWAG ng Senado si Philippine Airlines (PAL) Chairman Lucio Tan, anim na matatas na opisyal ng MalacaƱang at union leaders ng PAL upang magpaliwanag hinggil sa pagsasara ng nasabing kumpanya.

Sinabi ni Senate President Pro Tempore Blas Ople na kailangang malaman kung sino ang tunay na may kasalanan sa pagsasara ng PAL.

"Itinuturo ng management ang unyon samantalang itinuturo naman ng unyon ang management. Kailangang malaman natin kung sino talaga ang may kasalanan," ani Ople, Chairman ng Committee on Foreign Relations.

Bukod kay Tan, ipatatawag din ng Senado sina Transportation Secretary Vicente Rivera, Jr.; Executive Secretary Ronaldo Zamora; Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Gov. Gabriel Singson; Securities and Exchange Commission acting chairman Fe Eloisa Gloria; Finance Secretary at Chairman ng Task Force on PAL Edgardo Espiritu; NEDA Director-General Felipe Medalla at ang Presidente ng tatlong PAL union, ang ALPAP, PALEA at FASAP.

Umapela naman kahapon si Labor Secretary Bienvenido Laguesma sa lahat ng partidong sangkot sa pagsasara ng PAL na iwasan na ang magsisihan.

"Sana wala nang turuan o sisihan dahil may pagkukulang din ang bawat isa sa kanila," ani Laguesma.

Inamin ni Laguesma na maaari sanang napigilan ang pagsasara ng PAL kung naging higit na maunawain ang pamunuan ng PAL at ang PAL Employees’ Association (PALEA).

lnihayag kahapon ng Air Philippines na handa ang kanilang kumpanya na kunin ang serbisyo ng mga empleyado ng PAL na nawalan ng trabaho.

Kabilang sa mga kailangan ng Air Philippines sa pagpapalawak ng kanilang serbisyo ay mga piloto, mekaniko, crew at mga stewardess.

Maagang lilipad ngayon ang Philippine Airforce upang maghatid ng mga natambak na sulat bunga ng pagsasara ng PAL.

Sa pakikipag-ugnayan ni PAF Chief Lt. Gen. William Hotchkiss kay Post Master General Nicasio Rodriguez, sinabing unang ihahatid ang mga sulat na para sa Davao at Zamboanga at isusunod ang sa iba pang lalawigan.

Tiniyak din kahapon ni Health Secretary Alberto Romualdez, Jr. na hindi malalagay sa peligro ang pagpapadala ng mahahalagang gamot sa malalayong lalawigan kahit nagsara ang PAL dahil ipinagagamit naman sa DOH ang mga eroplano ng PAF. Nina Dulce Raymundo, Jeffrey Tiangco, Efren Montano Confesor Manalo, Mel Vivar-Cabigting, Nenet Villafania

Ang Mamatay nang Dahil Sa Iyo

Taliba
Saturday, September 26,1998
By Conrado Ching

TULAD ng kapitan ng isang barko, dinibdib ng binatang si Fortunato Bautista, 26, empleyado ng Philippine Airlines (PAL) ang pagsasara ng kanilang kumpanya. Sa pagkamatay ng PAL ay kasama rin siyang binawian ng buhay.

Si Bautista, master mechanic "c" na nakatalaga sa PAL airport ground equipment maintenance deparment ay namatay sa atake sa puso makaraang malaman ang malungkot na balita tungkol sa pagsasara ng PAL dakong ala-1:30 ng madaling-araw noong Huwebes.

Ayon kay Donato Duran, Pinuno ng Airport Equipment Maintenance Department at superior ni Bautista, inatasan niya ang lahat ng kanyang mga tauhan na pumasok sa trabaho sa kabila ng balitang pagsasara ng airline company.

Isang masunuring empleyado, tinangkang pumasok ni Bautista para sa shift na mula alas-4:00 ng hapon hanggang hatinggabi noong Miyerkules taglay ang pangambang mawawalan siya ng hanaphuhay.

Umalis si Bautista ng kanilang bahay makaraang mananghali upang pumasok. Habang nagmamaneho siya ng kanyang owner-type jeep, bigla na lamang siyang nakaramdam ng paninikip ng dibdib sa may C-5 road.

Mabilis na ipinarada ni Bautista ang kanyang jeep sa tabing-daan, pumara ng isang taxi at nagpahatid sa pinakamalapit na ospital, ang San Juan de Dios Hospital.

Pinanatili si Bautista sa ospital upang ganap na masuri subalit hindi naman siya nagpahinga at nang hatinggabi na ay patuloy pa rin sa pagmonitor ng negosasyon sa pagitan ngg PAL management at ng unyon sa Century Park Sheraton Hotel.

Nang marinig niya sa radyo na magsasara na ang kompanyang matapat niyang pinaglingkuran sa loob ng siyam na taon, inatake sa puso si Bautista at agad namatay.

Inside Info

Diario Uno
Friday, September 25, 1998
By JOJO LAPUS

MABUTI naman at umatras ang Palasyo sa plano nitong sagipin ang PAL sa pamamagitan ng pagbibigay ng P1.5-B pondong paluwal para makapagpatuloy ng operasyon ang nasabing airline.

Mas tama lang na tulungang umangat ang ibang maliliit na airlines na nagseserbisyo sa mga taumbayan kaysa dagdagan pa ang pagkalugi ng PAL. Masyado kasing pinasasakit ng mga miyembro ng unyon rig PAL ang ulo ng management kesehodang mawalan sila ng trabaho kaysa pasensiya sila. Sila na rin ang humukay ng kanilang libingan.

Friday, September 25, 1998

Inside Info

Diario Uno
Friday, September 25, 1998
By JOJO LAPUS

MABUTI naman at umatras ang Palasyo sa plano nitong sagipin ang PAL sa pamamagitan ng pagbibigay ng P1.5-B pondong paluwal para makapagpatuloy ng operasyon ang nasabing airline.

Mas tama lang na tulungang umangat ang ibang maliliit na airlines na nagseserbisyo sa mga taumbayan kaysa dagdagan pa ang pagkalugi ng PAL. Masyado kasing pinasasakit ng mga miyembro ng unyon rig PAL ang ulo ng management kesehodang mawalan sila ng trabaho kaysa pasensiya sila. Sila na rin ang humukay ng kanilang libingan.

Who is to Blame for PAL closure?

Philippine Daily Inquirer
Thursday, September 24, 1998
METRO
On Target
By Ramon Tulfo

THE MEMBERS of Philippine Airlines who voted no to the proposal to bail it out should take the blame for the death of Asia's oldest airline.

Ironically, the union members who chose to have PAL shut down compose only the minority. Majority of PAL employees either were non-union members or did not vote in the referendum.

In PAL, the minority ruled over the majority.

Most of the PAL employees did not approve of the demand of radical union members for pay increases. They wanted to keep their jobs, they were contented with their pay. Most of the PAL employees understood that the airline was losing heavily but trying to keep itself afloat.

They don't blame Lucio Tan, PAL Chair, for his decision to close down the nation's flag carrier. The Taipan was already fed up with the impossible demands of the radical union members.

"The people who voted to close down PAL didn't think of their fellow employees whose family will go hungry now that we're all out of work," a PAL office worker said.

But the PAL employees who did not take part in the referendum or just stayed in the sidelines, and did not want their voices heard are also partly to blame for the airline's closure.

Had the majority of the employees asserted their right to be heard. PAL wouldn't have closed down.

If Lucio Tan earned $25 billion from PAL, as the airline pilots' union claims, why would he close down the airline? He would naturally have kept it going so he could steal some more money.

It's just like killing the goose that lays the golden eggs.

Travel Agents Scramble for Flights to RP

Philippine Daily Inquirer
Thursday, September 24, 1998
BUSINESS

SINGAPORE - Travel agents said Wednesday they were scrambling to find seats for clients from Singapore to Manila with the closure of Philippine Airlines as the peak Christmas season approaches.

PAL is one of only two airlines with daily direct flights between Manila and Singapore. The other is Singapore Airlines, whose regional subsidiary, Silk Air, also flies to the southern Philippine cities of Cebu and Davao.

"I would think that a lot of employers of Filipino maids are calling travel agents to change their bookings" from PAL, said Alex Leow, Manager for Spring Travel Pte. Ltd.

"They were acting on news that Philippine Airlines would be closing," he said.

Before its closure, PAL was favored here by many employers of Filipino maids because of its cheaper air fares, Leow said.

There are an estimated 100,000 Filipinos in Singapore, most of them working as domestic helpers.

During the Christmas season when many Filipinos working overseas fly home, return air fares on economy class charged by PAL would be around S$600 (US$375), compared to Singapore Airlines' more than S$700 fare.

Other agents said seats on Singapore Airlines for this Christmas season were already hard to come by and flights on that carrier to Manila were already overbooked, adding they were looking at other alternatives such as flying to Manila via Bangkok or Kuala Lumpur.

A last-ditch survival plan to save the airline was rejected by the PAL union, paving the way for the closure of the 57-year-old flag carrier at midnight Wednesday.

One Singapore agent who asked not to he named said that since Sunday, all bookings made on PAL were "automatically cancelled" from their computers, as the beleaguered airline announced it may be closing.

In Hong Kong, Cathay Pacific Corporate Communications Manager Quince Chong said it was "closely monitoring developments" concerning Philippine Airlines.

"At the present moment, seating capacity should be quite adequate,” she said, adding that a decision whether to increase fares would depend on demand.

Cathay will increase its flights to Manila to 35 a week over the Christmas season from 32 at present, she said.

Tragic End of PAL?

The Philippine Star
Thursday, September 24, 1998
Roses and Thorns
By Alejandro R. Roces

In the Bible, we have the story of two women who claimed being the mother of a child. Solomon ordered that the child be divided into two so that each woman was amenable, but the other said, "Oh, no! Give her the child, but don't kill him!"

"Give the child to the woman who wants him to live, for she is the real mother," Solomon said.

The predicament of that child is the predicament of PAL. But in PAL’s case, the life of the "child" is secondary. So an old institution dies. The Philippines was the first country in Asia to have a flag carrier. Today, due to a management and labor dispute, we will be the only nation in Asia without a flag carrier. PAL was an institution and the strength of any nation rests on the strength of its institutions. PAL's closure could not have happened at a worse time. It closed just when we are undergoing what could be our very worst economic crisis in our entire history.

The history of PAL is the history of air travel in the Philippines. Contrary to what most people think, PAL actually initiated its operations before the war. On March 15, 1941, a small twin-engine Beech Model 18 flew 212 kms, from Baguio to Manila fully loaded with five passengers! When the war broke out, PAL's two aircrafts became part of the US Army Air Corps. Post-war operations resumed February 14, 1946 with 5 former US Airforce planes. Five months later, PAL chartered DC-4s to transport American servicemen to Oakland giving PAL the distinction of being the first airline to cross the Pacific after the war. By 1952, its international route covered two-thirds of the globe.

PAL went through years of unprofitable operations before it was privatized in 1993. Their situation was further aggravated when President Ramos signed Executive Order No. 219 deregulating Philippine civil aviation. Then just when they went into a $4 billion modernization and expansion plan, the world-wide economic crisis took place. In June 1998, a 22-day pilot strike halted operations. The loss per day was P200 million. So after 57 years of operation, PAL finally closed.

Now, there is no PAL, no PAL management and no PAL union.

The Art of Brinkmanship

The Philippine Star
Thursday, September 24, 1998
EDITORIAL

The dirge isn't playing yet for Philippine Airlines. Asia's oldest airline got a reprieve last night. Under strong pressure from President Estrada, PAL's management and union agreed to continue talking, thus preventing the airline's shut-down scheduled last night. Administration officials had scrambled to save the flag carrier after the union opted the other night to lose their jobs rather than suspend their collective bargaining agreement. And PAL chairman Lucio Tan appeared ready to lose an airline rather than continue flushing up to P60 million a day down the PAL drain.

PAL is saved — for now. But even if a compromise is forged between labor and management, no one can say how long the truce will hold. Saving PAL from the brink has one upside: it put into sharp focus how crucial the flag carrier's services are. Other airlines can try to fill in the void left by PAL. But even with all their fleets put together, these airlines can't absorb at this time PAL's daily passenger and cargo load. Neither can the public expect these smaller airlines, which are themselves suffering from the Asian contagion, to fly PAL's so-called mercy flights — those non-profitable routes that a flag carrier must serve.

PAL's flights remain suspended. The impact of the disruption in PAL's services is already being felt as passengers and businessmen vie for limited space in the other airlines and seek in vain for an equally swift mode of transportation in this archipelago. Water transportation is slow, unreliable and dangerous in this typhoon season. Land transportation is worse. A slowdown in PAL's operations is likely to hit the economy hard, and the biggest loser will be the public.

PAL's troubles highlight the need to develop the nation's domestic air transportation services. This point is being made at the worst time. The government must immediately offer incentives to lure new players in the domestic airline industry. But the incentives may have to be unusually liberal to entice new money to an industry that has been one of the worst hit by the Asian crisis. Incentives to foreign investors may also hit the fledgling local players in the airline industry. The problems of this industry, however, may require drastic solutions. The disruption in PAL's services has shown the vital role played by air transportation in the nation's economy. This is an industry that clearly needs strengthening.

The Working President

Tonight
Thursday, September 24, 1998
Pindar's List
By Jimmy Dauz

DURING the last two weeks, President Estrada was occupied with many things that clearly gives him the essence of a working President.

First, there was the problem of the never-ending strikes at the Philippine Airlines. A commentary of a leading paper rightly pointed out that it will be a tragedy for the first Asian airline to be the first to close shop.

Other Asian airlines which followed the path of PAL are now bathing in prosperity. Singapore Airlines, Cathay Pacific, China Airlines.

The Philippine Airlines, which was originally owned by the government, has changed its management profile so many times that people are confused as to who are really running the affairs of the flag carrier. The Soriano family first. Then Mr. Benigno Toda.
Then the government-managed PAL through the management skills of then GSIS chief Roman Cruz Jr.

And now Mr. LucioTan. Mr. Lucio Tan is a well-known cigarette manufacturer. But he won't rest with just that honor. He became a banker as well and a beer producer.

The President, in a sincere effort to end the crippling strike, used his office to broker a peace settlement, and this problem is only one of the many things that occupy the busy schedule of the President.

Within the span of two weeks, he was the guest speaker of two important press organizations. First, the Manila Overseas Press Club. Then followed his important policy speech before the National Press Club of the Philippines. This week, he is the guest of honor and principal speaker before a group of senior newsmen comprising the 365 Club at the Intercon Hotel.

But before the speech was even prepared, a dangerous typhoon visited the country and sunk a ferry boat called Princess of the Orient. More than 50 people were drowned in the choppy waters off Cavite. The 357 survivors were happy just to be rescued. It is a new life for them.

The President was kept busy further by the floodings of Central Luzon, especially the province of Pampanga.

Mr. Estrada has shown his concern for the unfortunate typhoon victims. He visited the affected provinces. Vice President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo was also on hand to help the President.

Last week was an unusually busy schedule for the President. But he was cool under pressure. And last week's experience will repeat itself as he goes on leading the nation in his first 100 days in office.

Tama ang batang si Aiza noon nang tanungin siya ni Mrs. Aquino sa TV kung bakit ayaw niyang maging Presidente.

“Maraming problema po at pampasakit ng ulo.” Well.

Selling Labor Down the River

Business World
Thursday, September 24, 1998
Calling a Spade
By Solita Collas-Monsod

And, I thought to myself, their capitulation would be understandable. But they are clearly made of sterner stuff. Would that all of us have the same courage of our convictions.

And what was PAL management's reaction to all this? I watched in fascination as a management spokesman, with a supercilious air, announced that even if the vote had been a "yes," the decision to close remained because the referendum result was only one of the considerations on whether to close or not. That certainly was not the media "spin" of PAL earlier, as echoed also by government. In other words, all that effort and humiliation on the part of labor would have been for nothing.

Damn their eyes.

And now it turns out the government does have some options to avert the closure of PAL and the ensuing transport crisis.

All of a sudden some presidential decree or other has been discovered and dusted off for reuse, to the effect that the Securities and Exchange Commission has the power to override management's closure decision, or take over the management of the company, much like the treatment of a bank under receivership. Other options are being explored -- a form of bailout — leasing the closed company's equipment from its creditors and continuing operations in one form or another.

The Senate, heretofore mute (supposedly because Congress is in recess), has suddenly found its voice, and is coming out with most of these alternatives.

All of these, one must understand, either coming to light or taking place only one day before the scheduled airline closure. The "last two minutes" routine.

But for the almost one week since Lucio Tan or technically the PAL Board of Directors announced the closure of PAL with nary a peep from the government directors (led by Bangko Sentral Governor Gabby Singson), the PAL employees and the rest of the country were left twisting in the wind. For that one week, government's response to the anguish of the PAL employees who were about to lose their jobs because they insisted on their constitutional right to collective bargaining, was to add its own pressure to the PAL management's economic blackmail.

•    There was nothing illegal about suspending a CBA for ten years.
•     You can't eat a CBA.
•    That CBA suspension was a condition of PAL's creditors and investors.
•    Only lawyers and union leaders were benefiting from the union position.
•    Government was helpless against Lucio Tan who was not even returning the President's call.

All the above issuing from the lips of government officials, particularly from the President and the Secretary of Finance. Causing sleepless nights not only for the PAL employees and their families, but also for owners of businesses dependent on PAL flights for their freight and cargo requirements, or for tourists and balik-bayans who might be stranded, those in the tourist service industries, families with children away in school.

All for what?

To get the PAL employees to override.

President Estrada a No-show at 365 Club

Manila Standard
Thursday, September 24, 1998
[Column]
By Emil P. Jurado

Note that soon after the Lagman brothers entered the pictutre, PAL unions became intransigent, even if it meant throwing out of the window the airline and the national interest. The agenda of the Left is to destabilize the country. And they are succeeding.  

IF PRESIDENT Estrada failed to attend the 26th founding anniversary of the 365 Club at Hotel Intercon the other night, he had a good reason.

The President was holding a series of make-or-break meetings that lasted late into the
night with PAL management and union representatives, first at the Palace, and then at No. 1 Polk Street in San Juan. He met again with the presidential task force on PAL after the employees'     referendum struck down Lucio Tan's offer to the unions.

We at the 365 Club understand the President's absence — it should not be taken against Erap. In fact, after I was told by Press Secretary Rod Reyes and Presidential Spokesman Jerry Barican that the President could not make it, I got a personal call from the President. He said he regretted his absence. Don't worry, Mr. President. We understand.

* * *

I can understand the President's predicament. Certainly, the closure of PAL as of midnight last night was of greater importance than the founding anniversary of a club of which I am the self-pro-claimed chairman.

The problem doesn't only affect 9,000 PAL employees, 1,388 of whom didn't want PAL saved, but the national interest as well. There will be other occasions.

In any case, the celebration went on well, with Reyes reading the President's speech and with Cris Villongco, Lani Misalucha and movie sensation Ara Mina entertaining the crowd. Armida Siguion-Reyna and publisher Teddyboy tocsin were the emcees.

I would like to thank friends of the club who attended the affair and the following who helped make it possible: Allied Bank (Lucio Tan), Weller Group (William Gatchalian). PLDT (Tonyboy Cojuangco), E. L.. Enterprises (E. Levin), Banco Filipino (Bobby Aguirre), and many others who prefer to be anonymous.

* * *

President Estrada really wants to save PAL. The P1.5-billion loan he approved to allow domestic flights of the national flag carrier to 14 vital routes to continue attests to this.

It should not be interpreted as a bail-out. It's just a loan for three months. Why three months?

MalacaƱang is hopeful that in three months, a solution can be found so that
PAL’s closure won’t affect vital services like banking, commerce and industry, basic services like mail and the delivery of important cargo, especially in the Visayas and Mindanao. MalacaƱang is also talking to prospective buyers.

The problem is, PAL's demise has tarnished the country's image internationally. PAL has been equated abroad with the Philippines. Since the first and "sunniest" airline of Asia is no more, the world may think that the Philippines has also gone under.

What worries foreign investors and the domestic business community is that labor unions can bring down a big corporation like PAL. The perception is that if this can happen to an institution like the national flag carrier, what chance do smaller business entities have against militant unions?

More than kidnappings and graft and corruption, it's the militant unions infiltrated by leftists that are cause for worry for foreign and local businessmen.

The government should look into the entry of leftist elements led by the Lagman brothers — Popoy, a former NPA chieftain, and Edcel, a former congressman — into the PAL negotiations.

Prospective PAL Investors Wanted CBA Suspension

Philippine Daily Inquirer
Thursday, September 24, 1998
OPINION
Political Tidbits
By Belinda Olivares-Cunanan

SEN. John OsmeƱa was on his way to Bacolod last weekend aboard a PAL plane, when just before its doors closed, a familiar figure came aboard and asked if he could sit beside him. It was PAL chairman Lucio Tan himself, en route to a convention of Chinese-Filipino businessmen in Bacolod. During the one-hour flight, Tan revealed to OsmeƱa that a consortium was willing to plunk down P50 billion to bail out PAL and keep it flying, but its minimum demand was a 10-year suspension of the CBA of PAL's employees. Tan gave the impression that the new investors felt the airline could be turned around if only there would be 10 years of industrial peace and that he was quite amenable to giving it another try despite the airline's P92-billion indebtedness.

The suspension of their CBA rights for 10 years was the specific management demand rejected by a very narrow margin by PAL employees in their recent referendum, which finally led to PAL’s closure at midnight last night. Frankly, I didn't think the side voting to close down PAL would win since so many jobs were at stake. I thought the issue of jobs and security in these times of crises would win over what probably is a difficult demand for a labor union to give up their bargaining rights. Some Palace officials conceded that a 10-year suspension was rather steep and they were looking at five years. But presently this was not acceptable to the investors, and the referendum overtook negotiations.

My only concern is that the PAL employees knew what they were getting into when they voted down a settlement with management; that it was their own decision and that they were not being manipulated by labor supermanipulator Popoy Lagman. The union should be aware, though that the sympathy of the public is against what is perceived to be the union's recalcitrance during the negotiations with management. The trouble with some labor leaders is that they line their pockets (many of them are multi-millionaires already), while it's the little employees who suffer from the loss of job.

In our conversation, John OsmeƱa emphasized the need to get even a fraction of PAL flying since the whole country would suffer if it completely stops operating. He noted that Cebu Plaza, the city's No. 1 business hotel, which closed down for a few months due to labor problems and the Asian crisis, just reopened last Sept. 15. The day after PAL's impending closure was announced, Cebu Plaza ran an ad in the local dailies saying that if PAL closed down, the hotel would have to close down again as it would not make money without PAL.

Cebu Plaza's plight is repeated in Davao City, where a number of hotels are said to be panicking. Davao hotels were anticipating good business from a number of conventions scheduled there, which would now presumably he cancelled. Other hotels and establishments around the Visayas and Mindanao will suffer the same fate.

Let's face it, the other smaller airlines cannot take on the 70 percent of air business that PAL used to service. With the state of our shipping industry, many travelers are afraid to take the boats. Smaller cities will be isolated. For instance, House Majority Leader Mar Roxas points out that while his fellow CapizeƱos used to take direct flights to and from Roxas City, now they will have to drive two hours to Iloilo to take the Cebu Pacific flight to Manila. And what about the cargo PAL used to fly? The tuna industry, for instance, which used to send its produce to the sushi bars of Tokyo in time for lunch, will now suffer. The cutflower industry of Visayas and Mindanao will also suffer.

As John OsmeƱa put it, out-of-towners will feel the loss of PAL deeply because this country is so Metro Manila-centered ('Imperial Manila"). Who'll now fly the daily newspapers from Manila? He pointed out that people from the provinces have to come to Manila to get visas as well as take professional examinations. Bank branches around the country release loans of up to P50,000 only; those involving bigger amounts are released at the banks' headquarters in Metro Manila.

No doubt about it, the economy will suffer gravely because of the closure of PAL. I wish Popoy Lagman and his ilk thought about it for once. The Palace task force set up by President Estrada to study a possible rescue of PAL is fully aware of this. The P15 billion cost of keeping PAL planes flying to 14 points in the Visayas and Mindanao is deemed to be much less than projected losses.

Patay na ang PAL; Pinatay ng Unyon

Kabayan
Thursday, September 24, 1998
Salamin
By Dante A. Ang

SAYANG. Sayang ang PAL. lyan ang pananaw ngayon nang marami sa resulta ng referendum na ginawa kahapon ng mga myembro ng PALEA. Sa botong 1,388 ayaw, Iaban sa 1,080 sang-ayon, ibinasura ng PALEA ang alok ni Tan na 3 board seats, 20 porsyento ng PAL kapalit ng suspensvon ng welga sa loob ng 10 taon.

Sa kabuuang 8,000 myembro ng PAL, lumalabas na 1,468 na wala pang 50 porsyento ang bumoto sa nakaraang referendum.

Sumobra na talaga ang laki ng ulo ng myembro ng unyon ng PAL. Pati tuloy ang P1.5 bilyon na ipinauutang ng pamahalaan sa PAL para mapaganda ang serbisyo nito sa mga destinasyong Iokal ay wala na rin.

Sa bandang huli, mabuti na ring magsara ang PAL. Ginagawa lamang gatasan ng ilang pulitiko, ng ilang empleyado ng PAL at kung sinu-sino pa.

KuPAL Ulit

Diario Uno
Thursday, September 24, 1998
Indio Bravo
By Argee Guevarra

SA galit at inis ng sambayanan sa pagsasara ng Philippine Airlines, mayorya ng mga komentarista ang nagbubunton ng sisi sa mga kawani nito, partikular na sa mga unyon ng PAL tulad ng ALPAP (unyon ng mga piloto), FASAP (flight attendants) at PALEA (rank-and-file).

Tampok sa kanilang walang humpay na pagbatikos ang teorya na ang mga unyon ang may kasalanan kung bakit napilitan si Lucio Tan na itiklop ang operasyon ng kauna-unahang airlines sa buong Asya. Itinuturo nito ang umano'y sobrang pagmamatigas ng mga unyon sa kanilang kahilingan.

Lumalabas tuloy na iniisip lamang ng mga unyon ang makikitid at sakim nitong interes sa halip na tulungan si Kapitan (bansag kay Lucio Tan) upang maibangong muli ang Iuging-lugi at baon-sa-utang na kompanya. Marami tuloy nakumbinsi na ang pagmamatigas ng mga unyon ang tanging dahilan kung bakit naihatid na sa huling hantungan ang PAL.

Bagamat tanggap ng lahat na may pagkukulang din ang mga unyon hinggil sa naganap na pagsasara ng PAL, hindi maaaring sabihing ang mga ito ang puno at dulo ng problema. Samut-sari ang sirkumstansiya kung bakit humimlay na ang PAL.

Unang-una rito ang katangian nito bilang dambuhalang kompanya na ang ilang libong kawani ay labis sa tunay na pangangailangan upang epektibo at episyenteng mapaglingkuran ang mga naglalakbay sakay ng PAL. Hindi ito kagagawan ng mga manggagawa kundi ng management na siyang nagtatakda ng mga atituntunin at patakaran hinggil sa pagkuha ng mga empleyadong kailangan ng kompanya.

Kung sinobrahan nila ang pagtanggap ng mga empleyado, responsibilidad ito ng pangasiwaan. Alam naman nila ang mga tungkulin sa mga manggagawa ayon sa ating batas. Kung nagpasok sila nang sobra, dapat punuan ang mga pangangailangan ng bawat empleyado. Hindi magiging problema ang pagtatanggal kung hindi nagpapasok nang sobra ang kompanya.

Hinggil naman sa pagkalugi at pagkabaon sa utang ng PAL, maliwanag na walang kinalaman dito ang mga unyon. Unang-una, kung maganda ang pagpapatakbo ng PAL, kung mahusay ang mga tagapangasiwa nito sa negosyo, hindi dudulas sa pagkalugi ang kompanya. Kung baga sa basketbol, nasa management ang bola kung paano ididribol para makabuslo ng kita. Sa kasamaang-palad, sa simulaa't sapul pa lamang ay puro bano at pulpol ang nagpapatakbo ng PAL.

At hinggil sa pagkabaon sa utang ng kompanya, aba, hindi naman ang mga unyon ang nangungutang kundi ang pangasiwaan, di ba? Kaya bakit sisisihin ang mga unyon sa isang patakarang utang-dito-utang-doon? Utang ng mga nagpasyang umutang pero gusto yatang pagbayarin ang mga rnanggagawang wala namang kinalaman sa mga transaksiyong iyon.

Ipinamumukha rin ng mga kampon ni Kapitan na pawang mga ganid at balasubas ang mga unyon kaya hindi marunong makisama at magmalasakit ang mga miyembro nito sa lahat ng planong ibangon ang kompanya dahil sa walang-tigil na paghingi ng taas sa sahod ng mga unyon.

Ang ganitong akusasyon ay walang batayan at kontra sa katotohanan. Nang sumiklab ang welga ng ALPAP noong ika-5 ng Hunyo, 1998, hindi naman ito bunga ng paghingi ng mga piloto ng taas sa suwetdo. Ito ay bunga ng karakarakang pagtatanggal sa trabaho at panggigipit sa mga miyembro nito.

Hindi salapi ang hiling ng mga piloto kundi seguridad sa trabaho. Seguridad na napatunayang segurado lamang sa pagtatanggal ng mga piloto sa trabaho.

Ikaila man ng mga tauhan ni Lucio Tan, iisa lang naman ang adyenda niya sa PAL. Ito ay ang pagdurog sa mga unyon. Matagal na niyang plano ito alinsunod sa Rehabilitation Program ng kompanya na paliitin nang husto. Sipain ang mga di-kailangan at di-produktibong kawani.

Bagamat tanggap na ito ay isang prerogatiba ng management na sinang-ayunan naman ng mga unyon. Ang hiling lang ng mga unyon ay isagawa ang rehabilitasyon matapos mapag-isipang mabuti upang mapangalagaan naman ang interes ng mga mawawalan ng trabaho. Hindi iyong uraurada't walang paggalang sa mga batayang karapatan — at benepisyo — ng mga tatanggalin.

Subalit ang hiling na ito ay hindi man lamang kinilala at pinahalagahan ni Kapitan. Ang welga ng mga piloto noong Hunyo ay ginamit na dahilan para magtanggal ng humigit-kumulang sa 5,000 pang manggagawa — 3,200 miyembro ng PALEA at 1,400 ng FASAP — ang kanyang sinagasaan na ala-hit-and-run.

Sa ganitong sitwasyon, hindi naman maaaring kagatin na lamang ng mga unyon ang tratong aso sa kanila ni Kapitan. Ipinarating nila ang kanilang daing subalit ang sagot ni Kapitan ay pananakot—na kung hindi raw sasang-ayunan ng unyon ang mungkahi nitong suspindihin ang CBA (na tanging dokumentong nagbibigay ng proteksiyon sa rnga manggagawa sa PAL) sa loob ng sampung taon ay isasara lamang ang kompanya.

Siyempre, hindi tinanggap ng mga unyon ang mungkahi ni Kapitan dahil ang mungkahing ito ay siyang papatay sa unyonismo ng PAL. Ang unyonismo na tanging takbuhan ng mga kawani sa kompanya laban sa mga kontra-manggagawang patakaran ni Lucio Tan.

Workers Didn't Vote for Closure of PAL

The Philippine Star
Thursday, September 24, 1998
Opinion
Postscript
By Federico D. Pascual

UNION members of Philippine Airlines didn't vote for the closure of the airline, as some quarters erroneously concluded after "No" won in a two-day referendum of the rank and file.

By a majority vote, the employees merely rejected a proposal of PAL Chairman Lucio Tan to (1) suspend their collective bargaining agreement for 10 years in exchange for (2) his giving 20 percent of PAL shares to the workers.

With the Tan package rejected, the airline may just fold up, yes, but that is not what the 9,000 or so employees want. In fact, until now they are praying hard for a miracle that would save PAL and their jobs.

The more visible rescue vehicle rushing to the scene looks like a jeep, with President Estrada at the wheel, loaded with P2 billion as bridge financing for three months.

The money, which breaks down to P666 million ($15 million) a month, looks like loose change against the gargantuan requirements of an international airline in extremis. But it gives everybody three months to work out something.

AS I was saying before I got sidetracked by newspaper circulation, PAL workers also showed in that referendum that they support their union leaders who have been vehemently against the Tan proposal.

Actually, union leaders asked members to boycott the referendum and almost half of the members stayed away. Hence the low turnout in the labor department-supervised referendum.

It is safe to assume that 99 percent of those who boycotted the polls on the prodding of their leaders were also for rejecting the suspension of the CBA for 10 years. Add their number to those who actually cast a No vote and you have an idea of how widespread is the rejection.

The emerging picture is that of a dying airline being pumped back to life by the Estrada administration, with prospective investors looking for an opening, and with either Tan or the union leaders (after all that recrimination, they cannot seem to work with each other anymore) receding in the background.

Jitters Over PAL Demise

The Philippine Star
Thursday, September 24, 1998
The Southern Beat
By Rolly Espina

Strangely, just as prospects are that Philippine Airlines may close up tomorrow, the public sympathy wells for the airline firm.

Nopes, not just the businessmen and hotel operators. Even ticket sellers, cab drivers, vendors and restaurant employes as well as those of Manokan country express disgust over the turn of events that could bring down a revered institution.

Senator John OsmeƱa may have summed up public sentiment neatly — "never have we been without PAL in the last 50 years." And the impact? “When the airline is closed the whole country will go back to the Japanese times."

Local radio listeners and newspaper readers latched on to every hit of news about PAL and the slim chance of its survival post the announcement by Chairman Lucio Tan that management was throwing in the towel post gargantuan losses. Gloom gripped many. Even officials of the Colegio de San Agustin-Bacolod PTA Sunday blasted ALPAP and PALEA officials for bringing PAL down.

There were two encouraging news. Tan, who was here during the weekend, told local mediamen he welcomes a government takeover of the financially-strapped airline. “It's all right, whoever likes to take over, welcome,” he said. Even adding that he is prepared to give the airline for free if the government assumes its debts. That was Tan's reaction to Sen. OsmeƱa's statement that President Joseph Estrada will allow government to take over the airline.

OsmeƱa, who is man of the Senate finance committee said he will help source the funds to run PAL.

A tall order. Not only is PAL losing P40 million a day, Tan reportedly told the solon that PAL owes $95 billion with an amortization of $9 billion yearly.

Most of the local PAL station employes are wondering how they would earn a living when the airline firm shuts down in a monocrop economy, there’s not much chance of placement elsewhere with the same pay scale as they have been getting from the airline firm.

Tourism Secretary Gemma Cruz Araneta called the reported closure of PAL as disastrous to the tourism industry. Local hotels have been begging for customers. And with the competing airlines unable to handle the passenger volume PAL used to carry, the organizers of the Masskara Festival in October are getting nervous that prospective outside visitors, including from abroad, may dip.

Although the Orient Princess was owned by Sulpicio Lines and Negros Navigation Company (NENACO) has an enviable safety record post the Don Juan tragedy, the latest sea mishap may temporarily dampen enthusiasm for sea travel during the typhoon season.

But until tomorrow, many Negrenses have their fingers crossed that somehow PAL may still be around until the 21st Century. But one thing was evident — until the prospects of the airline are finally going down, a lot of people consider PAL a part of their life.

Column by Jesus Sison

Malaya
Thursday, September 24, 1998
By Jesus C. Sison

THE government is considering two plans to rescue Philippine Airlines from closing down completely. One is to place PAL under receivership or place it under a government corporation. This should be done immediately. If PAL is allowed to close down for even only one month, it will be a disaster.

In any case, the government will end up with one big headache. The government has already approved to lend P1.5-billion to PAL, so that it can continue its domestic operations. The international flights will have to be terminated. For how long, I don't know.

I and many people still maintain that the labor unions in PAL caused the death of the airlines. That's why the lowly workers of the airline will become jobless. That's why they were crying.

Thursday, September 24, 1998

Is Erap Throwing Good Money After Bad?

Manila Standard
Thursday, September 24, 1998
Opinion 

THERE'S more than meets the eye in President Joseph Estrada's decision to pour in P1.5 billion of precious money to bail out a failing airline at the sacrifice of urgently bringing food and shelter to the impoverished masses of our people. Citing "national interest," the President has shown once again he could back out of his solemn pledge not to use what remains of very limited government resources to save Philippine Airlines, majority of whose employees in a referendum do not want save under the present management. And by his action, the President may well be showing that his famous slogan, "Erap para sa mahirap," is just an empty shibboleth, dredged up only whenever occasion arises to appease his hungry and now increasingly angry constituents.

For PAL's closure is not really a matter of life and death for the nation's dwindling economy as it is being pictured to be by some MalacaƱang functionaries. There are existing private airlines, like Air Philippines and Cebu Pacific, plying the domestic route and they have expressed their eagerness to expand operations to service the so-called missionary routes and prevent serious disruption in the interim. And then the government could declare an "open skies" policy for the meantime that would allow foreign airlines, who are more than willing and happy at this time, to double or triple their air services to this country and within to cover domestic routes — without use of any government-controlled funding. There is also the offer an American company, the Las Vegas-based Global Alliance investment Association, to pour in immediately $11 billion for a joint venture arrangement with the government or any private group here to continue with PAL's services.

Why President Erap is not seriously exploring first these easy options (Congress simply wants no disruption of PAL's domestic flights for obvious reasons) is a puzzle to many. Could it be, as many assume, because PAL's majority owner — who is well-known for self-dealing and "milking" PAL's earnings through his own dummy companies meeting the airline's every business need — is a close friend? ("Wala, akong kumpare. kaibigan o kamaganak.") Furthermore, the airline owner has more than once rebuffed the President when he begged him not to close PAL operations until a solution could be found. Perhaps, the President is genuinely and sincerely seeking a continuation of the domestic flights "in the national interest.” But is this enough reason to junk his well-accepted policy of not using government resources to bail out failing private companies, the reason for his privatization program, using instead the proposed P1.5 billion fund for vital and urgent social services?

But let's go slow in reaching conclusions until we find out the clear action of President Erap. He and his spokesmen, unable to get their act together as usual, have been making daily contradictory pronouncements.

Mayday! Mayday!

Business World
Thrusday, September 24, 1998
Across the Board
By Ismael G. Khan, Jr.

There's no love lost between Lucio Tan and the employees of PAL. This message was communicated loud and clear in the results of the PALEA referendum concluded by the DOLE the other evening. The "no" votes which edged out the "yes" votes, albeit by a slim margin, indicated that the employees would rather PAL shut down its operations than for them to continue working for Lucio Tan. There's some validity to the observation that the employees toted down the company's proposals because if the element of duress printed on the ballot - that Tan would close down the operation of the "no" votes won. PAL's personnel refused to be cowed any longer.

Unless the government steps in and bails out the national flag carrier, the whole economy would suffer - and that is an understatement. Various industrial sectors are already in panic, and their dire apprehensions are reflected in the further decline of the peso and the market slide. It is obvious that a national emergency is in the offing. Allowing Asia's oldest airline to crash this way would be a permanent blot on President Estrada's administration. There is more than ample justification for a government take-over of the 57-year-old flag carrier. Article XII, Section 17 of our Constitution states: "In times of national emergency, when the public interest so requires, the State may, during the emergency and under reasonable terms prescribed by it, temporarily take over or direct the operation of any privately owned public utility or business affected by public interest."

Senator Blas Ople has submitted a rational and practical plan for a government take-over. He proposed that the Securities and Exchange Commission, which is currently thrashing a rehabilitation scheme for the airline, convene a management committee and override the decision of the PAL Board of Directors (read Lucio Tan) to close down PAL's operations. I recall that is was also Senator Ople who first sounded the warning against a Lucio Tan take-over of PAL four or five years ago. He was concerned that permitting the Filipino-Chinese taipan to become the majority share-holder of the national flag carrier would not be in the nation's best interest. Subsequent developments have proven him to be unerringly right. A national emergency is at hand, and President Estrada and his economic advisers do not have much time to head it off'.

It is neither fair nor accurate to blame the unions for PAL's troubles. On hindsight, many of the corporate decisions which the Kapitan, as his admiring minions refer to him, made early on have proved and are proving to be egregious blunders.

It is far too simplistic to blame the pilots, cabin attendants, and the rank-and-file personnel for the company's losses. For one thing, PAL's total labor costs, including all benefits, are still much lower than those of other major airlines in the region. And although PAL may be over-staffed in some divisions, comparing the number of its personnel with those of Cathay Pacific or Singapore Airlines is akin to comparing apples and oranges. Neither of those airlines has domestic destinations enabling it to concentrate on profitable international routes with the utilization of long-haul, wide-body aircraft which are far more economical to operate than most of the airplanes in PAL's domestic fleet. Moreover, the personnel count in either Cathay's or Singapore's workforce does not include those of their catering, ground-handling and maintenance services as these lucrative operations are perforated by separate corporate entities.

With PAL's closure, Lucio Tan will now be able to spin off these profitable operations into separate corporations in which he, of course, will have the controlling interest.
Finally, there is the all-important aspect of national security. Many states retain majority ownership of their flag-carriers precisely for this reason. Until it was privatized, PAL's planes comprised the country's reserve airlift wing for military and emergency services.

There is a need to look anew into the circumstances which enabled Lucio Tan to gain control of PAL. I remember a high NISA official saying that they are concerned that Lucio Tan's extensive business interests in the People's Republic of China may make him susceptible to manipulation by a foreign power. Even as he astutely surrounds himself with retired AFP generals whom he has appointed as figurehead heads of his many corporations, it will help if he is made to come clean with the scope and extent of his business interests in China and foreign holdings elsewhere. The main businesses in which he is engaged in locally – the so-called sin products of cigarettes and beer as well as his alleged proclivity for tax evasion should be incentive enough for the honorable members of Congress to forget that many of them are the recipients of Lucio Tan's largesse and do right by the nation.

Goodbye to All That

Malaya
Thursday, September 24, 1998
By J.A. Dela Cruz

UP to the last minute, we were hoping that the planned closure of the Philippine Airlines would be aborted. Like an old habit, we were clinging to that one last glue invariably called national pride and sense of history which we thought would prod the entire country, Mr. Tan and the unions included, to come together, rise above the concerns of the moment and give PAL another chance. Unfortunately, like many of the things we hold dear, such a wish had to give way to the cold and cruel dictates of doing business in this day and age. PAL, as we know it, no longer exists. With its liquidation also goes the culture of dependence on government largesse or intervention which until this catastrophic event happened dominated and, in a very real sense, continues to exert considerable influence in the manner by which business is conducted in this country. Thus, in the case of PAL, no less than President Estrada and senior government officials tried to broker, in a sense, the airline's continued survival.

One can argue that because of its strategic importance as the national flag carrier, PAL's fate, much more its liquidation, deserved government's undivided attention. There should be no quarrel with that. But when the Aquino administration decided not too long ago to deregulate the airline industry and privatize PAL it already made a choice to leave the whole business of providing the country's air link and the corresponding responsibility to safeguard the riding public and ensure efficiency and effectivity to the dictates of the market. With competition providing the "leveraging hand" in the provision of safe, reliable and affordable air travel within and outside the countr, government's actual participation in the industry was deemed limited to providing the needful environment under which competition can be nurtured and sustained. Under this dictum, government, in fact, was obligated to accelerate the sale of its remaining stakes in PAL. In the same token, it was obliged to leave the business of running the airline including the decision to downsize, hire and fire and even liquidate all or part of the company to management.

If, as is now being argued, PAL is really such a strategic undertaking to leave to the private sector then government should not have even ventured to privatize it in the first place. It should have just poured in good money after bad and subsidized the airline with the hard earned monies and sacrifices of the entire Filipino public. It should have, in other words, declared PAL a national treasure and thus freed from the cruel dictates of the market. After all, it had gone through this route before so what's another try no matter how disastrous the results maybe. But, as is now made clear with this liquidation, that route is not only unresponsive and irresponsible. It may now be unavailable for good not only for PAL but for all other enterprises which heretofore had fed on government and, ultimately, the public to maintain their bloated workforces, unresponsive managements and uncompetitive positions. From here on, it will have to be produce, compete or die.

**********

We had expected all along that one or all of the PAL unions will bring out mismanagement as an issue against Mr. Tan and company. But we did not expect the same to be brought up this late and amateurishly at that by the otherwise thinking PAL pilots’ union. In the first place, the practices they accuse Mr. Tan of doing or having done, if true, should have been brought out in the open immediately after his takeover after all most of those allegedly questionable dealings happened then when the airline had to restructure its finances to accommodate the disastrous consequences of previous mismanagement and, in an effort to fast track its recovery, underwent a well regarded refleeting program. For the pilots to claim now that Mr. Tan and company has milked PAL high and dry in the fantastic amount of P25 billion is too much of a stretch, it makes one wonder where these people have been all this while. To begin with, PAL did not have then nor does it now have P25 billion to give away to anybody, Mr. Tan included. When he took over, the airline was already in the red and had to infuse P15 billion of his own money to keep the airline afloat. That capital is gone for good with only a number of equipment, leases and other properties left to answer for the airline's liabilities. In fact at the rate PAL is losing on a daily basis, analysts believe that the company’s net worth is already negative or nearing the same. Moreover, the pilots' arithmetic does not add up since their computations of possible rebates, self-dealings and related misdemeanors are all too questionable to be believed. In any event, as we have noted and continue to note to date if in the pilots' view they can run the airline better than Mr. Tan, then by all means they should now be allowed to take over the airline and spare Mr. Tan all the heartaches of producing the much needed cast or collateral or credit lines which he has had to extend up to yesterday to keep the airline flying. Not even the government financial institutions which had billions of peso sunked into PAL dared to offer to take over the company. Not then, Not yesterday.

Gov't Lets PAL Close

Business World
Thursday, September 24, 1998

As far as Finance Secretary Edgardo Espiritu is concerned, the government had no choice but allow majority owner Lucio Tan to close Philippine Airlines, Inc. (PAL) after its labor union rejected the tycoon's offer of an employee stock option plan.

After meeting with members of the PAL interagency task force late Tuesday night, Mr. Espiritu said the government will not bail out the flag carrier. Instead, the government will require two of the four medium-sized domestic airlines — Cebu Pacific and Air Philippines to expand their fleet to be able to service 14 key cities.

He said the government will carry out only public services such as mails and necessary cash transfer through planes of the Philippine Air Force (APF).

"For the meantime, our priority will be on domestic routes ... there will be no international flights." he said.

The Finance chief said another interagency task force was created to coordinate the transition period and allow the capacity buildup of the other airlines. The nine-member team includes Mr. Espiritu, Senators Sergio OsmeƱa and Francisco Tatad. Quezon City Rep. Feliciano Belmonte and Quezon Rep. Danilo Suarez, Executive Secretary Ronaldo Zamora, Transportation and Communications Secretary Vicente Rivera, Labor and Employment Secretary Bienvenido Laguesma and Socioeconomic Planning Secretary Felipe Medalla.

Mr. Espiritu said the government's earlier offer to loan out P1.5 billion through state-held financial institutions will no longer be necessary since PAL will start liquidating its assets to pay off creditors and suppliers.

"The President is upset. Everybody's upset. But what can we do? The (PAL) union made their decisions and they decided to lose their jobs," he told reporters.

Virtually defending Mr. Tan from accusations that mismanagement caused PAL's substantial losses, Mr. Espiritu said the Ramos government's liberalization plan "discriminated (against) PAL."

"For example, the weekly passenger demand for the Hong Kong-Manila route was only 2,000 but they (Ramos government) allowed a 16,000 capacity."

To sweeten the pot for the remaining airlines, he said the government could allow them to charge higher rates for the mandatory missionary routes.

In an interview at the Senate, Mr. Espiritu said Cebu Pacific, Air Philippines and Grand Air have been preparing to upgrade their facilities since last month.

At the same time, the PAF may fly some service routes and PAL aircraft while the company's problems are being settled, added PAF chief William Hotchkiss.

In an interview before appearing at a hearing of the House of Representatives' subcommittee on appropriations, Mr. Hotchkiss said the PAF is just waiting for a directive from MalacaƱang.

However, he said the PAF will likely focus on the delivery of mail and postal services and does the currency rounds of the Bangko Sentral.

According to Mr. Espiritu, the government "(has) been talking to the other airlines to immediately do something to upgrade their capability... I am very confident that they will be able to cover (the) vacuum (left by PAL) within a month."

"What we are going to watch very carefully is the day-to-day requirement of servicing the vital aspect of air transport system (such as) the transfer of cash, clearing checks, mails and other vital services," he added.

Fearing Meltdown

Manila Standard
Thursday, September 24, 1998
By Alex Magno

THERE is a disturbing disparity between the sense of dread sweeping the business community and the appearance of complacency on the part of the political leadership.

The business community is fearing the worst. Past-due loans have risen dramatically. Investments have dropped. The stock market is in the doldrums.

Anything could give at any moment. After many years of heady growth, the economy now appears terribly vulnerable.

The air of dread is made heavier by the predicament of the Philippine Airlines (PAL). Deep in debt and burdened with labor disputes, PAL has looked like a corporate Titanic long before it announced closure plans.

PAL's predicament will exert tremendous pressure on our banking system. Its impact on the banking sector will have to be put in the context of numerous other corporations currently unable to service their debts.

The disruption of air service bodes ill for the economy. It will produce a bottleneck for domestic commerce. It will stifle the tourism industry. It will produce the semblance of a handicapped economy, strapped down by in-efficiency.

The situation is aggravated by calamities. After the long drought, floods have wiped out billions of pesos worth of crops and livestock in Pangasinan province. A spanking new interisland ferry sinks in stormy waters just out of Manila Bay.

And while things seem to be breaking apart, the politicians are out playing their usual games. Daily we are treated to stories of one Estrada faction or another angling to take over this or that corporation.

Unhealthy context

The regional and global context for our economic prospects in the near term is not very encouraging either. In fact, it is this context of volatility and uncertainty that makes our situation seem all the more vulnerable.

The turmoil in Indonesia has knocked off this very large country as a dynamic regional economic partner in the near term. Suharto has been deposed; but his successor has shown little indication that a new path to recovery has been opened for this nation.

The political and economic crisis in Indonesia has encouraged gloomy appraisals for the entire ASEAN region. These gloomy appraisals have been further boosted by the sudden transformation of Malaysia from an oasis of stability to a vortex of turmoil.

A few weeks ago, Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir decided to go berserk. He imposed currency controls and sacked his deputy prime minister, Anwar Ibrahim, who enjoys the confidence of the international investment community.

Over the last weekend, Mahathir had Anwar arrested. That decision sparked riots in Kuala Lumpur. Now, people are comparing Malaysia with Indonesia: two very sick cousins in an unhealthy region.

Further out, China is feeling great pressure on its currency. If Beijing decides to devalue its currency, a new round of volatility could sweep the region.

With Russia struggling on the ledge, with growing uncertainty over the effect of Bill Clinton's predicament on the stock market, and with the Latin American economies showing signs of sagging, it is no longer fashionable to speak of the Asian Contagion. The worry warts are now looking at the possibility of a global financial meltdown.

Such an event will be catastrophic. For us, it will mean a shrinking of our export markets and a drying up of investments. A deep depression looms as a possibility.

Crisis leadership

The most insistent question being asked these days is this: Do we have a crisis leadership in place or is a crisis of leadership what we have?

It is a disturbing question to be saddled with as we survey a stormy economic horizon.

For as long as that question persists, there will be hesitation among investors. In a climate of uncertainty, investors will want to be assured that a plan is in place for any eventuality.

But there is little sense of strategy emanating from the top. No authoritative voice — certainly not the President's — is heard reassuring the nation that the urgency is felt and the complexities understood.

MalacaƱang Palace certainly does not look like the command post of the great economic war we must wage. Except for the feverish meetings held to save PAL, there is little visible effort to pool suggestions, gather advice and build consensus on a comprehensive strategy to fight off recession.

Because of this, many of us feel that the nation is adrift — like a ship without a captain.

Famous Last Words

Philippine Daily Inquirer
Thursday, September 24, 1998
Opinion
There’s the Rub
By Conrado De Quiros

THE ORIGINAL was Richard Gordon. He said at the height of the US bases debate, "You can't eat sovereignty."

Gordon, of course, said that in the context of championing the passage of the US bases treaty. The groups who were opposing the treaty were citing sovereignty among their reasons for wanting to kick out the bases. Gordon argued that there was much economic benefit to come from the bases treaty, and much economic loss to follow from its rejection, especially for the residents of Olongapo who stood to lose jobs and livelihood. Sovereignty is nice, he said, but it won't feed the impending poor of Olongapo.

Time has proved him wrong. You can eat sovereignty. Gordon in fact was first to rush to the head of the table when sovereignty served its buffet. Subic did not die of destitution and nostalgia; it prospered by leaps and bounds under the aegis of the SBMA. The residents of Olongapo did not pass on to oblivion, they became a republic unto themselves. Sovereignty proved so edible, Gordon tried as best he could to hold on to it—or its culinary expression—in the SBMA. He's still trying.

Comes now Joseph Estrada repeating history. Last weekend, he told the labor unions of PAL, "You can't eat a CBA.''

Erap said that while berating the unions for rejecting Lucio Tan's seemingly magnanimous offer to save the airline. That offer gave the unions several seats in the PAL board, with the appropriate stocks to go with it, in exchange for them agreeing not to push for a new CBA for 10 years. Palea, the ground crew union which counts the most number of PAL workers, initially accepted the offer but turned it down later. Fasap, the flight attendants union, rejected it outright. Both drew the line at scrapping collective bargaining. Which provoked Erap to blurt out, "What's the use of a CBA when you're hungry? You can't eat a CBA."

He won't need time to prove him wrong.

In fact, he doesn't need to wait for the future, he needs only look back at the past. To that time specifically when he appeared in a movie titled, "Bangkang Papel sa Dagat ng Apoy." That was only 15 years or so. In that movie, he plays a labor leader who leads a strike. He does so, amid the monumental sacrifices a strike entails, because the workers can't get a decent break. Earlier in the movie, an old man who has worked in the textile factory all his life is told he may get only a few years' worth of work at half pay by way of retirement benefit. The reason for this, the owners say, is that the company is losing. Which seems to be so, but only because the owners are passing off their profits from their factory to their other companies, the ones that do not employ too many workers.

You can eat a CBA. It's far more patently edible than sovereignty. Sovereignty takes long to reveal its gustatory delights, a CBA more swiftly so. A CBA is all a worker has—short of a strike—to assure that he and his family will eat. It's the heart and soul of unionizing, as we said the other day. Without collective bargaining, what do you need a union for? You might as well put up a social club. Collective bargaining is what assures that old men who have worked for a factory all their lives will get the retirement benefits they deserve. Collective bargaining is what assures that young women who marry and have children will get the maternity leave they need. Collectives bargaining is what assures that men and women who have nothing to live on but their toil will be able to live on it.

The CBA is not the cause of PAL's collapse; scrapping the CBA will not prevent PAL's collapse. Though while at this, who invented the CBA in the first place? The way PAL management is portraying it, you'd think the CBA was the handiwork of communists. In fact, collective bargaining is not a communistic tool, it is a resolutely capitalistic one. It follows the logic of open markets

You have a management that is trying to wring as much productivity as it can from its workers and a union that is trying to extract as much reward as it can from management and you reach an equilibrium representing just compensation. What's this? It's all right for employers’ to demand level playing fields, the rule of market forces, a reasonable return on investment, but not so workers?

As it is, the PAL unions are not trying to extract as much as they can from their employers. They are not asking for a raise, they are not asking for more benefits. They are merely trying to defend what they have, which they would lose without a CBA. The referendum last Tuesday showed clearly the sentiments of the majority of the workers in Palen. They should get the sentiments’ of Fasap and Alpap members as well just to see in what opprobrium the rank-and-file holds Tan's proposal. No one wants to lose his or her job. But only so long as it remains a job. A situation where your employer may be free to oppress you and expect you to slobber all over him in gratitude is not a job. It is masochism.

Indeed, the whole thing goes beyond PAL. PAL is merely the test case. The real question is: Do we still need a Department of Labor and Employment? Or more fundamentally, do we still need labor laws? For why should we bother to have labor laws when we do not want to follow them anyway? Why should we bother to have a labor department when we want to outlaw labor unions anyway? Let's stop the pretense. Let's abolish the DOLE, scrap labor laws and burn labor leaders in effigy or in the flesh.

It's idiotic. Labor laws are there to protect workers. Labor unions are there to protect workers. They are mandated by the Constitution. Yet what are Erap and Tan and their cohorts saying now but that labor laws may apply only in times of plenty? What are they saying now but that labor unions may unionize only in times of plenty? What in fact are they saying now but that workers should be protected only in times when they least need protecting?

You can eat a CBA. What you cannot eat are bile and guile and stupidity.

Abrogation of CBA Unacceptable to PAL Workers

Philippine Daily Inquirer
Thursday, September 24, 1998
Opinion

THE EDITORIALS and a few columnists in the major dailies appear one in lamenting how the pig-headed and unreasonable labor unions have bought Asia's first airline to its knees. Contrary to what writers like Emil Jurado and Ninez Cacho-Olivares would have the reading public believe, the members of the PAL unions are not the foaming-at-the-mouth radical unionists they are made up to be. They are just like any ether employee trying to earn an honest living.

I know, for I am one of them. My wife and I are both cabin attendants with Philippine Airlines and between the two of us, we have served the company for over 23 years. We met in PAL, and are now raising three kids. PAL has given us so much and for this we are thankful. But all these things we are enjoying were not given to us on a silver platter. We had to work hard for them. And work hard we did.

Jet lag and extreme fatigue were part of the regimen. Crossing time zones over a dozen times a month distorted sleep patterns, being inside a pressurized metal capsule 30,000 feet above the ground for hours and hours were part of the job. Being away from our families on Christmas, birthdays and other special occasions were taken as matters of fact should our schedules dictate so. It was working in this stressful and high-risk environment that made me realize how important working with clear-cut work conditions and duty limitations was.

Our flight work conditions and compensation are laid out in the Collective Bargaining Agreement drafted by both PAL management and our union, the Flight Attendant and Stewards Association of the Philippines (Fasap). This was hammered out after months of negotiations and sought to strike a balance between what was needed to make the company economically stable while providing appropriate compensation for our labors.

The spirit of the agreement was exemplified by the more-work-more-pay no-work-no-pay scheme. Instead of battling for a substantial increase in our basic salary, we agreed to the work productivity compensation proposed by management. But more important were the provisions regulating our work hours and rest periods after flights. Years of jet lag, missed sleep and fatigue were taking a toll on our health. But as long as our schedules conformed to the CBA, we had no reason to complain.

The PAL management's offer of 60,000 shares per employee in exchange for the 10-year suspension of the CBA came as a shock. Upon clarification, we learned that the proposal was not just for the suspension of CBA negotiations for the next 10 years, or for a no-strike clause but the abrogation of the work rules and productivity compensation scheme currently in place. With only the basic salary to remain, the productivity pay and other allowances (which account for approximately 50 percent of our take-home pay) would be scrapped. Rest provisions currently bordering on unhealthy levels, would be drastically cut. The work conditions would be set at management's discretion. Pardon the mistrust, but PAL management has not exactly been the champion of workers rights.

Time and time again, our union has signified its willingness to discuss specific economic and work provisions which would help PAL in these critical times. We are willing to make sacrifices to make PAL survive.

PAL management's position on the negotiating table and the swiftness of the decision to close the company lead us to suspect that the decision to shut PAL down had already been made long before. It's proposal for the abrogation of CBAs is nothing but an attempt to make the unions a scapegoat for the closure.

While the Alpap and Palea strikes have worsened PAL's woes, responsibility for the staggering $2.1-billion debt rests on management's hands. They were at the helm when the ship started to sink. One might even suspect management deliberately rammed the iceberg. Charge of corporate plunder has been bannered in major dailies.

My wife and I dread the prospect of joining the ranks of the unemployed. With a mortgage on the house, bills to pay and kids to feed, the situation is nothing short of a personal disaster. And I know this sentiment is shared by thousands of my co-workers

But, we are facing our fears and we stand by our union in rejecting PAL management's proposal for us to surrender our rights and our dignity for 60,000 pieces of silver. To ask the employees to give up their CBA or face a company shutdown is blackmail in its crudest form.

We call upon the Estrada administration to take drastic steps in resolving this issue. We reiterate our union's willingness to sacrifice certain provisions for PAL's survival. We continue to pray that a solution can be found. But should the forces of darkness succeed in closing Philippine Airlines, then God's will be done.

As our nation celebrates the Centennial, we link arms with the Filipino workers in our common quest for humane working conditions and a just society.

Mabuhay ang mga manggagawa ng PAL!—EARL C. PALACIOS, Mary Home Phase II, Molino), Bacoor, Cavite